HEIRS OF LATE SHARDABEN KANUBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir) vs NIRUBEN D/O AMBUBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL — 17/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160003322022
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
17/2022
Filing Date
12-08-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
12-08-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIRS OF LATE SHARDABEN KANUBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir)
Adv. M P BRAHMBHATT1.
HEMANTBHAI KANUBHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
NIRUBEN D/O AMBUBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL
HEIRS OF LATE CHITRANJANBHAI AMBUBHAI PATEL(Legal Heir)
HITESHBHAI KANUBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 18-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 11-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 17/2022 | Bipinbhai Somabhai Bhoi & Others v. Jitendrabhai Gordhanbhai Paten & Another The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (Order to Show Cause) for injunction relief regarding disputed agricultural land. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for trial, holding that without proving a prima facie case, considerations of balance of convenience or irreparable loss are immaterial. Consequently, the court rejected the injunction petition with the plaintiff to bear the costs of the interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 17/2022 | Bipinbhai Somabhai Bhoi & Others v. Jitendrabhai Gordhanbhai Paten & Another The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (Order to Show Cause) for injunction relief regarding disputed agricultural land. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for trial, holding that without proving a prima facie case, considerations of balance of convenience or irreparable loss are immaterial. Consequently, the court rejected the injunction petition with the plaintiff to bear the costs of the interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts