SHIVABHAI DHULABHAI CHAUHAN vs JAYABEN CHANDUBHAI PATEL Advocate - B A BAMBHA — 9/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH160002382022
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
16-06-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
16-06-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, VASO
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIVABHAI DHULABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. J H MAKWANA
HEIRS OF LATE MAVJIBHAI DHULABHAI CHAUHAN(Legal Heir) 2.
JASHIBEN MAVJIBHAI CHUAHAN 2.
KAMLABEN MAVJIBHAI CHAUHAN 2.
AMBALAL MAVJIBHAI CHAUHAN 2.
LALJIBHAI MAVJIBHAI CHAUHAN 2.
RAYSINHBHAI MAVJIABHAI CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
JAYABEN CHANDUBHAI PATEL Advocate - B A BAMBHA
CHETNABEN CHANDUBHAI PATEL
JAYKESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATEL
BAKULESHBHAI CHANDUBHAI PATEL
MANJULABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL
KAMLESHBHAI BIPINBHAI PATEL
PRIYANKABEN BIPINBHAI PATEL
BHAVNABEN JASHBHAI PATEL
PANKAJBHAI JASHBHAI PATEL
SHAILESHBHAI JASHBHAI PATEL
PARESHKUMAR KALABHAI BHARVAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 17-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 19-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No. 09/2022 Outcome: Plaintiff's suit for declaratory relief dismissed. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for trial. The agreement to sell the disputed agricultural land was invalid under Section 43 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, as it lacked prior Collector's permission—a statutory condition precedent. Consequently, specific performance of an invalid agreement cannot be decreed, and the suit was rightfully rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Regular Civil Suit No. 09/2022 Outcome: Plaintiff's suit for declaratory relief dismissed. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case for trial. The agreement to sell the disputed agricultural land was invalid under Section 43 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, as it lacked prior Collector's permission—a statutory condition precedent. Consequently, specific performance of an invalid agreement cannot be decreed, and the suit was rightfully rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts