GIRISHABHAI SOMABHAI BHOI vs MATAR DUDHA UTPADAK SHAKARI MANDALEE L Advocate - D.H.SHAH — 220/2018
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10 (1) c. Status: For Other evidence of firstparty. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJKH140004292018
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
220/2018
Filing Date
03-12-2018
Registration No
220/2018
Registration Date
03-12-2018
Court
LABOUR COURT, NADIAD
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GIRISHABHAI SOMABHAI BHOI
Adv. S.K.RANA
Respondent(s)
MATAR DUDHA UTPADAK SHAKARI MANDALEE L Advocate - D.H.SHAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
For Other evidence of firstparty
For Other evidence of firstparty
For Other evidence of firstparty
For Other evidence of firstparty
For Other evidence of firstparty
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | For Other evidence of firstparty |
| 04-05-2026 | For Other evidence of firstparty |
| 06-04-2026 | For Other evidence of firstparty |
| 16-03-2026 | For Other evidence of firstparty |
| 16-02-2026 | For Other evidence of firstparty |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 220/2018 Petitioner: Girishabhai Somabhai Bhoi Respondent: Matar Dudha Utpadak Shakari Mandalee L. Court: Industrial Court, Nadiad Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner be reinstated to his original position with full back wages, arrears, and benefits within 60 days. The respondent cooperative was also directed to pay 20% of the withheld wages as awarded. The court found the termination of the petitioner's employment as illegal and unjustified, determining he was entitled to reinstatement and monetary compensation for lost wages during the period of suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 220/2018 Petitioner: Girishabhai Somabhai Bhoi Respondent: Matar Dudha Utpadak Shakari Mandalee L. Court: Industrial Court, Nadiad Outcome: The petition was partially allowed. The court ordered that the petitioner be reinstated to his original position with full back wages, arrears, and benefits within 60 days. The respondent cooperative was also directed to pay 20% of the withheld wages as awarded. The court found the termination of the petitioner's employment as illegal and unjustified, determining he was entitled to reinstatement and monetary compensation for lost wages during the period of suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts