Malake Sikandarmiya Subamiya vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon — 149/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(c). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJKH140003222024

Filing Number

149/2024

Filing Date

15-Jul-2024

Registration No

149/2024

Registration Date

15-Jul-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Malake Sikandarmiya Subamiya

    Adv. D.H.Shah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon

  2. 2.Om Shiva Enterprise

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the worker's appeal, finding him to be an employee of Samavala No. 1 (the principal employer) rather than the contractor. The court awarded reinstatement with back wages of ₹50,000 plus future salary from the date of termination, rejecting the argument that employment through a contractor breaks the employer-employee relationship. The court emphasized that control, supervision, and wage payment determine actual employment status, not merely contractual arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    For award

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 01-Jan-2026

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 04-Dec-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 04-Sep-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 07-Aug-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 10-Jul-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 22-May-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 27-Feb-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 23-Jan-2025

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 19-Dec-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 28-Nov-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 17-Oct-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 06-Sep-2024

    For Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 20-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 15-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 149/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the worker's appeal, finding him to be an employee of Samavala No. 1 (the principal employer) rather than the contractor. The court awarded reinstatement with back wages of ₹50,000 plus future salary from the date of termination, rejecting the argument that employment through a contractor breaks the employer-employee relationship. The court emphasized that control, supervision, and wage payment determine actual employment status, not merely contractual arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case