Malake Sikandarmiya Subamiya vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon — 149/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(c). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJKH140003222024
Filing Number
149/2024
Filing Date
15-Jul-2024
Registration No
149/2024
Registration Date
15-Jul-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, NADIAD
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Malake Sikandarmiya Subamiya
Adv. D.H.Shah
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon
-
2.Om Shiva Enterprise
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Judegement
Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the worker's appeal, finding him to be an employee of Samavala No. 1 (the principal employer) rather than the contractor. The court awarded reinstatement with back wages of ₹50,000 plus future salary from the date of termination, rejecting the argument that employment through a contractor breaks the employer-employee relationship. The court emphasized that control, supervision, and wage payment determine actual employment status, not merely contractual arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Mar-2026
For award
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Mar-2026
For Argument of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Mar-2026
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2026
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jan-2026
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Jan-2026
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Dec-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Nov-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Oct-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Sep-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Aug-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Jul-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-May-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Feb-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Jan-2025
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Dec-2024
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Nov-2024
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Oct-2024
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Sep-2024
For Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2024
Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the worker's appeal, finding him to be an employee of Samavala No. 1 (the principal employer) rather than the contractor. The court awarded reinstatement with back wages of ₹50,000 plus future salary from the date of termination, rejecting the argument that employment through a contractor breaks the employer-employee relationship. The court emphasized that control, supervision, and wage payment determine actual employment status, not merely contractual arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts