Malake Sikandarmiya Subamiya vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon — 149/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(c). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJKH140003222024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
149/2024
Filing Date
15-07-2024
Registration No
149/2024
Registration Date
15-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, NADIAD
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malake Sikandarmiya Subamiya
Adv. D.H.Shah
Respondent(s)
Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited Advocate - M.G.Memon
Om Shiva Enterprise
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | For award | |
| 16-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party | |
| 09-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party | |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the worker's appeal, finding him to be an employee of Samavala No. 1 (the principal employer) rather than the contractor. The court awarded reinstatement with back wages of ₹50,000 plus future salary from the date of termination, rejecting the argument that employment through a contractor breaks the employer-employee relationship. The court emphasized that control, supervision, and wage payment determine actual employment status, not merely contractual arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court partially allowed the worker's appeal, finding him to be an employee of Samavala No. 1 (the principal employer) rather than the contractor. The court awarded reinstatement with back wages of ₹50,000 plus future salary from the date of termination, rejecting the argument that employment through a contractor breaks the employer-employee relationship. The court emphasized that control, supervision, and wage payment determine actual employment status, not merely contractual arrangements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts