Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited — 43/2025
Case under The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 C 2. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.
RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)
CNR: GJKH140002722025
Filing Number
43/2025
Filing Date
28-08-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
28-08-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, NADIAD
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel
Adv. D.H.Shah
Respondent(s)
Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
REPLY
For Notice Serve to opponent
For Notice Serve to opponent
For Notice Serve to opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | REPLY |
| 05-03-2026 | For Notice Serve to opponent |
| 19-02-2026 | For Notice Serve to opponent |
| 29-01-2026 | For Notice Serve to opponent |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 43/2025 Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel v. Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal challenging the reinstatement of corporate insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent company from proceeding with insolvency, arguing certain procedural violations. However, the court held that IBC provisions override other laws and established that once a moratorium is declared under Section 14 of the IBC, all proceedings against the corporate debtor must cease, and creditors must file claims through the insolvency process to protect their interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 43/2025 Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel v. Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal challenging the reinstatement of corporate insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent company from proceeding with insolvency, arguing certain procedural violations. However, the court held that IBC provisions override other laws and established that once a moratorium is declared under Section 14 of the IBC, all proceedings against the corporate debtor must cease, and creditors must file claims through the insolvency process to protect their interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts