Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel vs Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited — 43/2025

Case under The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 C 2. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJKH140002722025

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

43/2025

Filing Date

28-08-2025

Registration No

43/2025

Registration Date

28-08-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 C 2

Petitioner(s)

Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel

Adv. D.H.Shah

Respondent(s)

Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Lmited

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

01-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

REPLY

05-03-2026

For Notice Serve to opponent

19-02-2026

For Notice Serve to opponent

29-01-2026

For Notice Serve to opponent

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 43/2025 Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel v. Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal challenging the reinstatement of corporate insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent company from proceeding with insolvency, arguing certain procedural violations. However, the court held that IBC provisions override other laws and established that once a moratorium is declared under Section 14 of the IBC, all proceedings against the corporate debtor must cease, and creditors must file claims through the insolvency process to protect their interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 43/2025 Girishabhai Dasharathbhai Patel v. Ceema Electricals Lighting Products India Pvt Limited The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal challenging the reinstatement of corporate insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The petitioner sought to prevent the respondent company from proceeding with insolvency, arguing certain procedural violations. However, the court held that IBC provisions override other laws and established that once a moratorium is declared under Section 14 of the IBC, all proceedings against the corporate debtor must cease, and creditors must file claims through the insolvency process to protect their interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case