MINESH PRAVINBHAI PATEL vs VISHALKUMAR BHUPATSINH KHANT Advocate - S G MALEK — 861/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 04th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110011932025
Filing Number
861/2025
Filing Date
22-09-2025
Registration No
861/2025
Registration Date
22-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MINESH PRAVINBHAI PATEL
Adv. V D PAREKH
Respondent(s)
VISHALKUMAR BHUPATSINH KHANT Advocate - S G MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 861/2025 Court Decision: The accused Vishalkumar Bhupatsinh Khant is convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months simple imprisonment. He is ordered to pay compensation of ₹1,80,000 to complainant Minesh Pravinbhai Patel within three months, or face an additional fine. The judgment emphasizes that cheques carry statutory presumption of consideration, and the accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 861/2025 Court Decision: The accused Vishalkumar Bhupatsinh Khant is convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to six months simple imprisonment. He is ordered to pay compensation of ₹1,80,000 to complainant Minesh Pravinbhai Patel within three months, or face an additional fine. The judgment emphasizes that cheques carry statutory presumption of consideration, and the accused failed to rebut this presumption with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts