AJAYKUMAR VASUDEV PATEL PRO MALTI ELECTRONIS vs RAHUBHAI KHODABHAI DAYMA — 57/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH110010472025
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
57/2025
Filing Date
22-08-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
22-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AJAYKUMAR VASUDEV PATEL PRO MALTI ELECTRONIS
Adv. V D PAREKH
Respondent(s)
RAHUBHAI KHODABHAI DAYMA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 12-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-12-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff seeking specific performance of a land sale agreement and directing the defendant to execute a registered deed of sale. The court found that the defendant had already received the full sale consideration (₹4,40,000) but refused to deliver the registered sale deed without justified reasons, thereby breaching the agreement. The court ordered the defendant to execute and register the sale deed immediately and imposed costs on the defendant for non-compliance with previous directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff seeking specific performance of a land sale agreement and directing the defendant to execute a registered deed of sale. The court found that the defendant had already received the full sale consideration (₹4,40,000) but refused to deliver the registered sale deed without justified reasons, thereby breaching the agreement. The court ordered the defendant to execute and register the sale deed immediately and imposed costs on the defendant for non-compliance with previous directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts