AJAYKUMAR VASUDEV PATEL PRO MALTI ELECTRONIS vs RAHUBHAI KHODABHAI DAYMA — 57/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH110010472025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

57/2025

Filing Date

22-08-2025

Registration No

57/2025

Registration Date

22-08-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 38,

Petitioner(s)

AJAYKUMAR VASUDEV PATEL PRO MALTI ELECTRONIS

Adv. V D PAREKH

Respondent(s)

RAHUBHAI KHODABHAI DAYMA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

01-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

09-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

23-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

12-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

03-12-2025

ISSUES

Interim Orders

03-12-2025
ORDER

SUMMARY: The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff seeking specific performance of a land sale agreement and directing the defendant to execute a registered deed of sale. The court found that the defendant had already received the full sale consideration (₹4,40,000) but refused to deliver the registered sale deed without justified reasons, thereby breaching the agreement. The court ordered the defendant to execute and register the sale deed immediately and imposed costs on the defendant for non-compliance with previous directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff seeking specific performance of a land sale agreement and directing the defendant to execute a registered deed of sale. The court found that the defendant had already received the full sale consideration (₹4,40,000) but refused to deliver the registered sale deed without justified reasons, thereby breaching the agreement. The court ordered the defendant to execute and register the sale deed immediately and imposed costs on the defendant for non-compliance with previous directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case