Government of Gujarat vs DHARMENDRAKUMAR SURESHBHAI SONI Advocate - R.M.SARAIYA — 61/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,467,468,471,420,120B,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110000722018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
61/2018
Filing Date
02-08-2008
Registration No
61/2018
Registration Date
02-08-2008
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DHARMENDRAKUMAR SURESHBHAI SONI Advocate - R.M.SARAIYA
YOGESHBHAI HARGOVINDBHAI JOSHI
Adv. B T PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kheda convicted two accused under IPC Sections 420 (cheating) read with Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) and Sections 465/471 (forgery). The court found they conspired to create forged land documents (fake 7/12 extracts), enabling wrongful property transfer and government revenue loss. Both were sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and fines, rejecting their defense that they didn't directly benefit, as the law requires establishing only one aspect of dishonesty (wrongful loss OR wrongful gain). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kheda convicted two accused under IPC Sections 420 (cheating) read with Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) and Sections 465/471 (forgery). The court found they conspired to create forged land documents (fake 7/12 extracts), enabling wrongful property transfer and government revenue loss. Both were sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and fines, rejecting their defense that they didn't directly benefit, as the law requires establishing only one aspect of dishonesty (wrongful loss OR wrongful gain). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts