SANDIPSINH MANGALSINH MAHIDA vs PIYUSHKUMAR KARSHANBHAI THAKOR — 47/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 13th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110000712026
Filing Number
47/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANDIPSINH MANGALSINH MAHIDA
Adv. V D PAREKH
Respondent(s)
PIYUSHKUMAR KARSHANBHAI THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: Cri.Case No.47/2026 Court Decision: The accused Piyushkumar Karshanbhai Thakor was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque with insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and imposed a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) payable to the petitioner Sandipsinh Mangalsinh Mahida within 3 months. The court also issued a non-bailable arrest warrant against the accused, who failed to appear during judgment pronouncement. Key Reasoning: The magistrate found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient balance. Despite proper notice, the accused neither paid the amount nor appeared in court. The conviction was upheld based on statutory presumption under Section 138 and the accused's failure to rebut it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: Cri.Case No.47/2026 Court Decision: The accused Piyushkumar Karshanbhai Thakor was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque with insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and imposed a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) payable to the petitioner Sandipsinh Mangalsinh Mahida within 3 months. The court also issued a non-bailable arrest warrant against the accused, who failed to appear during judgment pronouncement. Key Reasoning: The magistrate found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient balance. Despite proper notice, the accused neither paid the amount nor appeared in court. The conviction was upheld based on statutory presumption under Section 138 and the accused's failure to rebut it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts