SANDIPSINH MANGALSINH MAHIDA vs PIYUSHKUMAR KARSHANBHAI THAKOR — 47/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 13th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110000712026

Case disposed

Filing Number

47/2026

Filing Date

02-02-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

02-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

SANDIPSINH MANGALSINH MAHIDA

Adv. V D PAREKH

Respondent(s)

PIYUSHKUMAR KARSHANBHAI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

13-05-2026

Disposed

22-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

13-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

CASE SUMMARY: Cri.Case No.47/2026 Court Decision: The accused Piyushkumar Karshanbhai Thakor was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque with insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and imposed a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) payable to the petitioner Sandipsinh Mangalsinh Mahida within 3 months. The court also issued a non-bailable arrest warrant against the accused, who failed to appear during judgment pronouncement. Key Reasoning: The magistrate found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient balance. Despite proper notice, the accused neither paid the amount nor appeared in court. The conviction was upheld based on statutory presumption under Section 138 and the accused's failure to rebut it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Cri.Case No.47/2026 Court Decision: The accused Piyushkumar Karshanbhai Thakor was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque with insufficient funds. The court sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment and imposed a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 (one lakh rupees) payable to the petitioner Sandipsinh Mangalsinh Mahida within 3 months. The court also issued a non-bailable arrest warrant against the accused, who failed to appear during judgment pronouncement. Key Reasoning: The magistrate found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient balance. Despite proper notice, the accused neither paid the amount nor appeared in court. The conviction was upheld based on statutory presumption under Section 138 and the accused's failure to rebut it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case