JARINABANU SABIRKHAN PATHAN vs NIL BHADRESHKUMAR PATEL Advocate - 1469/2002 — 162/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH090002212024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
162/2024
Filing Date
12-03-2024
Registration No
162/2024
Registration Date
12-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JARINABANU SABIRKHAN PATHAN
Adv. A B KALYANI
Respondent(s)
NIL BHADRESHKUMAR PATEL Advocate - 1469/2002
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Mehsana First Class Magistrate Court convicted accused Nihal Badreshkumar Patel under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque. The complainant loaned ₹2,00,000 to the accused for business purposes; the accused issued a cheque which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite legal notice, the accused failed to repay the amount. The court found the complainant's evidence credible and the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act favored the complainant. The accused neither appeared to contest nor provided rebuttal evidence. The court sentenced the accused to three months imprisonment with compensation of ₹2,00,000 to the complainant, and an additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Mehsana First Class Magistrate Court convicted accused Nihal Badreshkumar Patel under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque. The complainant loaned ₹2,00,000 to the accused for business purposes; the accused issued a cheque which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite legal notice, the accused failed to repay the amount. The court found the complainant's evidence credible and the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act favored the complainant. The accused neither appeared to contest nor provided rebuttal evidence. The court sentenced the accused to three months imprisonment with compensation of ₹2,00,000 to the complainant, and an additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts