Government of Gujarat vs SUNILBHAI CHOTUBHAI RANA Advocate - P B KHATRI — 447/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH080007692024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

447/2024

Filing Date

09-07-2024

Registration No

447/2024

Registration Date

09-07-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,504,506(2),

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SUNILBHAI CHOTUBHAI RANA Advocate - P B KHATRI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

27-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

25-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Katlal Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Sunil Bhai Chhotu Bhai Rana of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506(2). The court found that while the complainant's testimony described a verbal altercation and alleged assault, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The defendant's cross-examination contradicted key allegations, and documentary evidence (site panchnama) alone could not establish the alleged beating or death threat. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Katlal Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Sunil Bhai Chhotu Bhai Rana of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506(2). The court found that while the complainant's testimony described a verbal altercation and alleged assault, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The defendant's cross-examination contradicted key allegations, and documentary evidence (site panchnama) alone could not establish the alleged beating or death threat. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case