Government of Gujarat vs SUNILBHAI CHOTUBHAI RANA Advocate - P B KHATRI — 447/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH080007692024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
447/2024
Filing Date
09-07-2024
Registration No
447/2024
Registration Date
09-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SUNILBHAI CHOTUBHAI RANA Advocate - P B KHATRI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Katlal Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Sunil Bhai Chhotu Bhai Rana of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506(2). The court found that while the complainant's testimony described a verbal altercation and alleged assault, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The defendant's cross-examination contradicted key allegations, and documentary evidence (site panchnama) alone could not establish the alleged beating or death threat. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Katlal Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Sunil Bhai Chhotu Bhai Rana of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506(2). The court found that while the complainant's testimony described a verbal altercation and alleged assault, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The defendant's cross-examination contradicted key allegations, and documentary evidence (site panchnama) alone could not establish the alleged beating or death threat. Consequently, the accused was discharged under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts