KANUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATEL vs LATE. BHOGILAL MOTILAL PATEL(Dead) Advocate - V D PATEL1. — 41/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH070012192024
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
41/2024
Filing Date
09-12-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
09-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI PATEL
Adv. C C PATEL
Respondent(s)
LATE. BHOGILAL MOTILAL PATEL(Dead) Advocate - V D PATEL1.
KIRITKUMAR BHOGILAL PATEL
Adv. V D PATEL1.
RAJUBHAI BHOGILAL PATEL
Adv. V D PATEL1.
ANJANABEN WIDOW OF JITENDRAKUMAR BHOGILAL PATEL
Adv. V D PATEL1.
KARTIKKUMAR JITENDRAKUMAR PATEL
Adv. V D PATEL
NILESHKUMAR CHANDRAKANT PATEL
Adv. V D PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 02-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 05-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's interim application (Misc. Application No. 5) seeking a mandatory injunction and relief against defendants regarding disputed agricultural land in Kheda district, Gujarat. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership or possession rights over the contested property, and that the balance of convenience did not favor granting the requested relief. The order was pronounced on February 23, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the plaintiff's interim application (Misc. Application No. 5) seeking a mandatory injunction and relief against defendants regarding disputed agricultural land in Kheda district, Gujarat. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership or possession rights over the contested property, and that the balance of convenience did not favor granting the requested relief. The order was pronounced on February 23, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts