FAKIR AHEMADSH KALUSH (DIVAN) vs BAFATISHA KALUSH DIVEN Advocate - B P PUROHIT — 10/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH070005522025

Filing Number

10/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, THASRA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAKIR AHEMADSH KALUSH (DIVAN)

    Adv. K N PATEL

  2. 2.FAKIR YASINSH KALUSH (DIVAN)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAFATISHA KALUSH DIVEN Advocate - B P PUROHIT

  2. 2.SABIRASH RAHIMSH DIVAN

  3. 3.HALIMABIBI RAHIMSH DIVAN OF DAUGHTER

  4. 4.HANIFABIBI RAHIMSH DIVAN OF DAUGHTER

  5. 5.KHERUNBIBI RAHIMSH DIVAN OF DAUGHTER

  6. 6.MAHEMUDSH RAHIMSH DIVAN

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim relief application (Interim Order-5) seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants to prevent interference with the disputed agricultural land. The court found that the plaintiffs lack a prima facie case as the defendants, being legal heirs of the original landowner, have superior ownership rights over the property. The court held that no injunction can be granted against the property owner in favor of persons with unlawful possession, thereby rejecting the plaintiffs' relief application without prejudice to their rights in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Documentary Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 25-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim relief application (Interim Order-5) seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants to prevent interference with the disputed agricultural land. The court found that the plaintiffs lack a prima facie case as the defendants, being legal heirs of the original landowner, have superior ownership rights over the property. The court held that no injunction can be granted against the property owner in favor of persons with unlawful possession, thereby rejecting the plaintiffs' relief application without prejudice to their rights in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case