PATEL HARESHKUMAR ARVINDBHAI vs INDUBHAI MAGANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - S B PARMAR — 413/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH070005242019
Filing Number
413/2019
Filing Date
05-10-2019
Registration No
413/2019
Registration Date
05-10-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL HARESHKUMAR ARVINDBHAI
Adv. N.R.SODHAPARMAR
Respondent(s)
INDUBHAI MAGANBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - S B PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 30-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 413/2019 SKIP The document is substantially garbled and largely unreadable in its original form. While some structured legal text (primarily English legal provisions and citations) appears toward the end, the majority of the judgment consists of corrupted Gujarati text that cannot be reliably interpreted or summarized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 413/2019 SKIP The document is substantially garbled and largely unreadable in its original form. While some structured legal text (primarily English legal provisions and citations) appears toward the end, the majority of the judgment consists of corrupted Gujarati text that cannot be reliably interpreted or summarized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts