GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BAFATISHA KALUSHA DIWAN Advocate - S B PARMAR — 49/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),351(2)(3),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH070000592026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
49/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204060250312
Police Station
THASRA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BAFATISHA KALUSHA DIWAN Advocate - S B PARMAR
SABEJABIBI ALIAS DHANU WIFE OF NAJIRSHA IBRAHIMSHA DIWAN
Adv. S B PARMAR
PARVEJSHA ALIAS PAPPU SON OF NAJIRSHA DIWAN
Adv. S B PARMAR
SHAHURKHASHA SON OF NAJIRSHA DIWAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Bafatisha Kalusha Diwan & Others Case No: 49/2026 Court: Magistrate's Court, Khedbrahma, Sabarkantha District, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(2)(3), 352, and 354 (criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and assault), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies describing alleged beatings and threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Bafatisha Kalusha Diwan & Others Case No: 49/2026 Court: Magistrate's Court, Khedbrahma, Sabarkantha District, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(2)(3), 352, and 354 (criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and assault), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimonies describing alleged beatings and threats. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts