D/D CHIMANBHAI NATHABHAI(Legal Heir) vs VIJAYBHAI KANTIBHAI KA.PATEL Advocate - B A PATEL — 49/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 038,039. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH040000592015
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
49/2015
Filing Date
14-05-2015
Registration No
49/2015
Registration Date
14-05-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D/D CHIMANBHAI NATHABHAI(Legal Heir)
Adv. M D PATEL1.
JAGDISHBHAI CHIMANBHAI PATEL 1.
PRAGNESHBHAI DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.2.
DHARMISTHABEN DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.2.
BHARTIBEN DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.2.
NAYNABEN DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.2.
VARSHABEN DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.2.
ARCHANABEN DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.2.
RESHMABEN DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.2.
MOHINIBEN DINESHBHAI PATEL 1.
BHAUMIKKUMAR RAJESHBHAI PATEL 1.3.
HARIKRUSHNA RAJESHBHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
VIJAYBHAI KANTIBHAI KA.PATEL Advocate - B A PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 30-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 11-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court partially granted the plaintiff's appeal (Petition No. 5) and partially granted the defendant's counter-claim appeal (Petition No. 16). The court ordered that the plaintiff's right to the disputed land property described as Sector 3391 (measuring 41-81-00 sq.m.) shall remain in status quo until final determination of the suit, with the defendant similarly restrained from interfering with the property. The costs of the appeals are to be borne by the parties as per the final judgment in the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially granted the plaintiff's appeal (Petition No. 5) and partially granted the defendant's counter-claim appeal (Petition No. 16). The court ordered that the plaintiff's right to the disputed land property described as Sector 3391 (measuring 41-81-00 sq.m.) shall remain in status quo until final determination of the suit, with the defendant similarly restrained from interfering with the property. The costs of the appeals are to be borne by the parties as per the final judgment in the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts