NATHUSINH GULABSINH DABHI vs LAKAHABHAI PUNABHAI DABHI Advocate - P B VARSOLIYA — 94/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH030023362023
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
94/2023
Filing Date
05-10-2023
Registration No
94/2023
Registration Date
05-10-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATHUSINH GULABSINH DABHI
Adv. M A PATHAN
Respondent(s)
LAKAHABHAI PUNABHAI DABHI Advocate - P B VARSOLIYA
MADHIBEN MADHABHAI DABHI
Adv. P B VARSOLIYA
DINESHBHAI MADHABHAI DABHI
Adv. P B VARSOLIYA
VINODBHAI MADHABHAI DABHI
Adv. P B VARSOLIYA
SONI VASANTKUMAR DAMODARDAS
Adv. P B VARSOLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 94/2023 Petitioner: Nathusinh Gulabsinh Dabhi Respondents: Lakahabhai Punabhai Dabhi and others Outcome: The petitioner's revision petition is allowed. The court set aside the lower court's order and directed that the petitioner's original suit regarding the disputed property be decided on its merits. The court found that the petitioner had valid grounds regarding a sale agreement for agricultural land in Shantrund village, and that the respondents failed to properly follow contractual procedures and provide required notices. The case is remitted for proper adjudication according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 94/2023 Petitioner: Nathusinh Gulabsinh Dabhi Respondents: Lakahabhai Punabhai Dabhi and others Outcome: The petitioner's revision petition is allowed. The court set aside the lower court's order and directed that the petitioner's original suit regarding the disputed property be decided on its merits. The court found that the petitioner had valid grounds regarding a sale agreement for agricultural land in Shantrund village, and that the respondents failed to properly follow contractual procedures and provide required notices. The case is remitted for proper adjudication according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts