STATE OF GUJARAT vs RANJITSINH ALIAS JITU MOHANSINH CHAVDA Advocate - B T MAKWANA — 27/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 29th May 2026.

Case disposed

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJKH010077052024

Filing Number

27/2024

Filing Date

23-Dec-2024

Registration No

27/2024

Registration Date

23-Dec-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

5-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

29-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204021240583

Police Station

DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 352,54
Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. S R BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJITSINH ALIAS JITU MOHANSINH CHAVDA Advocate - B T MAKWANA

  2. 2.UDAYSINH ALIAS MAHARAJ SAMANTSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. B T MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat vs. Ranjitsinh Chavda & Udaysinh Chauhan (27/2024) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused persons under BNS Sections 352, 354 and the SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(R)(S). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused made caste-based slurs against the complainant in public view with intent to humiliate. Critical witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies, and no independent, impartial witnesses unconnected to the complainant corroborated the alleged derogatory utterances, making conviction unjustifiable under established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 15-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  9. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    4th Addl District Judge

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    4th Addl District Judge

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    4th Addl District Judge

  14. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  16. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  19. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  23. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  24. 21-Jun-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  25. 21-May-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  26. 03-May-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    3rd Addl District Judge

  27. 05-Apr-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    3rd Addl District Judge

  28. 15-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    3rd Addl District Judge

  29. 15-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl District Judge

  30. 04-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 23-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat vs. Ranjitsinh Chavda & Udaysinh Chauhan (27/2024) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused persons under BNS Sections 352, 354 and the SC/ST Atrocities Act Section 3(1)(R)(S). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused made caste-based slurs against the complainant in public view with intent to humiliate. Critical witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies, and no independent, impartial witnesses unconnected to the complainant corroborated the alleged derogatory utterances, making conviction unjustifiable under established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case