SUBHAM ICE FACTORY OWNER HITESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI JAYSVAL vs PGVCL, KESHOD Advocate - K T DUBEY — 51/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 17th April 2026.

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJJN210014352024

Case disposed

Filing Number

51/2024

Filing Date

26-12-2024

Registration No

51/2024

Registration Date

26-12-2024

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

SUBHAM ICE FACTORY OWNER HITESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI JAYSVAL

Adv. D V KUMBHANI

Respondent(s)

PGVCL, KESHOD Advocate - K T DUBEY

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

25-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Gujarat District Court reversed the trial court's dismissal of a power theft case, ruling in favor of ice factory owner Hiteshkumar Rashikbhai Jaishwal against Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (PGVCL). The appellate court held that PGVCL failed to prove electricity theft since it relied solely on a meter anomaly code without expert technical evidence, independent electrical inspector testing, or a mandatory provisional assessment, thereby invalidating the Rs. 8.53 lakh power theft bill issued in 2010. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat District Court reversed the trial court's dismissal of a power theft case, ruling in favor of ice factory owner Hiteshkumar Rashikbhai Jaishwal against Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (PGVCL). The appellate court held that PGVCL failed to prove electricity theft since it relied solely on a meter anomaly code without expert technical evidence, independent electrical inspector testing, or a mandatory provisional assessment, thereby invalidating the Rs. 8.53 lakh power theft bill issued in 2010. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case