LATE KANJIBHAI LILABHAI CHAVDA HEIR PARVATIBEN KANJIBHAI vs ROHITBHAI MOHANBHAI PATTANI Advocate - K C SHINGALA — 7/2022
Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th May 2026.
WC FATAL LC - W.C. Application Fatal
CNR: GJJN160005282022
Filing Number
7/2022
Filing Date
14-Jun-2022
Registration No
7/2022
Registration Date
14-Jun-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LATE KANJIBHAI LILABHAI CHAVDA HEIR PARVATIBEN KANJIBHAI
Adv. S V BORICHANGAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROHITBHAI MOHANBHAI PATTANI Advocate - K C SHINGALA
-
2.SHIVAJI CHHOTUBHA VAGHELA
Adv. D N MULCHANDANI
-
3.RAMDEVSHIH CHHOTUBHA VAGHELA
Adv. D N MULCHANDANI
-
4.Sri Sarak Ma Seva Trust
-
5.Trustee Shri Harpalsingh Anirudhsingh Vaghela
-
6.Valjibhai Hirajibhai kerai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 7/2022 - Labour Court, Junagadh Petitioner: Late Kanjibhai Lilabhai Chavda's Heir (Parvatiben Kanjibhai) Respondents: Rohitbhai Mohanbhai Pattani and others Court's Decision: The Labour Court partially allowed the workmen's compensation claim. The court found that Kanjibhai Lilabhai Chavda, aged 69, died from an accidental fall while working on a temple construction, establishing him as an employee. The court awarded compensation of ₹7,43,245 plus 12% simple interest from the accident date, along with 15% penalty of ₹1,11,981, holding respondents 2-6 jointly and severally liable. Respondent 1 (contractor) was found not to be the direct employer, limiting his liability accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Apr-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Apr-2026
For Arguement of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Apr-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Apr-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
26-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
27-Nov-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Nov-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
25-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
29-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2025
For Framing of Issue
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
-
02-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Nov-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Oct-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Sep-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Aug-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jul-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Jun-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-May-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Apr-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Mar-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Mar-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Feb-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Jan-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Dec-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Dec-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Nov-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Oct-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Sep-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Aug-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jul-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Jun-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Jun-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-May-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Apr-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Mar-2023
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Mar-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
02-Feb-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Jan-2023
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Nov-2022
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Nov-2022
For Framing of Issue
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Oct-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Sep-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Sep-2022
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Sep-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Aug-2022
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2022
Summary of Case 7/2022 - Labour Court, Junagadh Petitioner: Late Kanjibhai Lilabhai Chavda's Heir (Parvatiben Kanjibhai) Respondents: Rohitbhai Mohanbhai Pattani and others Court's Decision: The Labour Court partially allowed the workmen's compensation claim. The court found that Kanjibhai Lilabhai Chavda, aged 69, died from an accidental fall while working on a temple construction, establishing him as an employee. The court awarded compensation of ₹7,43,245 plus 12% simple interest from the accident date, along with 15% penalty of ₹1,11,981, holding respondents 2-6 jointly and severally liable. Respondent 1 (contractor) was found not to be the direct employer, limiting his liability accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts