Vinod Keshav Chauhan vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 38/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160004262025
Filing Number
38/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinod Keshav Chauhan
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | For award |
| 12-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vinod Keshav Chauhan vs GRASIM Industries Ltd (REF(T) No. 38/2025) The Labour Court dismissed the worker's industrial dispute petition. Worker was terminated from GRASIM's Indian Rayon unit on 12/2/2019 without notice or compensation, but filed the dispute reference only 24 years later in 2024. Court held the dispute was time-barred and stale; worker failed to explain the inordinate delay or demonstrate sufficient cause for condoning it, citing Supreme Court precedent that unexplained delay of years makes disputes non-justiciable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Vinod Keshav Chauhan vs GRASIM Industries Ltd (REF(T) No. 38/2025) The Labour Court dismissed the worker's industrial dispute petition. Worker was terminated from GRASIM's Indian Rayon unit on 12/2/2019 without notice or compensation, but filed the dispute reference only 24 years later in 2024. Court held the dispute was time-barred and stale; worker failed to explain the inordinate delay or demonstrate sufficient cause for condoning it, citing Supreme Court precedent that unexplained delay of years makes disputes non-justiciable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts