THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUNNY URFE SUNIL RAVJIBHAI SOLANKI — 593/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN120009652025
Filing Number
593/2025
Filing Date
23-Sep-2025
Registration No
593/2025
Registration Date
23-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203070240498
Police Station
VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNNY URFE SUNIL RAVJIBHAI SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case 593/2025 Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sunny Urfe Sunil Ravjibhai Solanki, of theft charges under IPC Section 303(2) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole a motorcycle (Hero Splendor Pro, Reg. No. GJ-05-NG-1915) during the alleged timeframe, as key evidence and investigation records were incomplete and circumstantial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 593/2025
Case 593/2025 Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sunny Urfe Sunil Ravjibhai Solanki, of theft charges under IPC Section 303(2) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole a motorcycle (Hero Splendor Pro, Reg. No. GJ-05-NG-1915) during the alleged timeframe, as key evidence and investigation records were incomplete and circumstantial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts