SHRUTIBEN W/O KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA vs GORDHANBHAI MOHNBHAI VAGHASIYA Advocate - D M SHAH — 19/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6,9,26. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th July 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN120002212024

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

11th July 2026

Filing Number

19/2024

Filing Date

04-03-2024

Registration No

19/2024

Registration Date

04-03-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 6,9,26

Petitioner(s)

SHRUTIBEN W/O KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA

Adv. A B DUDHREJIA

MINOR DHVANIT KISHORBHAI VAGHASIYA

Respondent(s)

GORDHANBHAI MOHNBHAI VAGHASIYA Advocate - D M SHAH

KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

03-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

07-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

30-04-2025
ORDER

Case Summary R.C.S. No. 19/2024 - Regular Civil Suit The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim relief in this family property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters) sought to prevent the defendant (respondent) from disposing of disputed ancestral agricultural land. The court granted the relief, finding that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case regarding inheritance rights to the property and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the asset pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary R.C.S. No. 19/2024 - Regular Civil Suit The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim relief in this family property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters) sought to prevent the defendant (respondent) from disposing of disputed ancestral agricultural land. The court granted the relief, finding that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case regarding inheritance rights to the property and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the asset pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case