SHRUTIBEN W/O KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA vs GORDHANBHAI MOHNBHAI VAGHASIYA Advocate - D M SHAH — 19/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6,9,26. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 11th July 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 11-Jul-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN120002212024

Filing Number

19/2024

Filing Date

04-Mar-2024

Registration No

19/2024

Registration Date

04-Mar-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 6,9,26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRUTIBEN W/O KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA

    Adv. A B DUDHREJIA

  2. 2.MINOR DHVANIT KISHORBHAI VAGHASIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GORDHANBHAI MOHNBHAI VAGHASIYA Advocate - D M SHAH

  2. 2.KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA

Case History

  1. 11-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 30-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 19-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 28-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 09-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 30-Apr-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary R.C.S. No. 19/2024 - Regular Civil Suit The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim relief in this family property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters) sought to prevent the defendant (respondent) from disposing of disputed ancestral agricultural land. The court granted the relief, finding that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case regarding inheritance rights to the property and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the asset pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 30-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 18-Mar-2025

    Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Feb-2025

    Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 07-Jan-2025

    Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 10-Dec-2024

    Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 19-Nov-2024

    Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 14-Oct-2024

    Counter Claim

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 18-Sep-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 20-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 23-Jul-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 16-Jul-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 04-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 06-May-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 16-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 04-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary R.C.S. No. 19/2024 - Regular Civil Suit The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim relief in this family property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters) sought to prevent the defendant (respondent) from disposing of disputed ancestral agricultural land. The court granted the relief, finding that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case regarding inheritance rights to the property and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the asset pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case