SHRUTIBEN W/O KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA vs GORDHANBHAI MOHNBHAI VAGHASIYA Advocate - D M SHAH — 19/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6,9,26. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th July 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN120002212024
Next Hearing
11th July 2026
Filing Number
19/2024
Filing Date
04-03-2024
Registration No
19/2024
Registration Date
04-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRUTIBEN W/O KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA
Adv. A B DUDHREJIA
MINOR DHVANIT KISHORBHAI VAGHASIYA
Respondent(s)
GORDHANBHAI MOHNBHAI VAGHASIYA Advocate - D M SHAH
KISHORBHAI GORDHANBHAI VAGHASIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 03-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary R.C.S. No. 19/2024 - Regular Civil Suit The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim relief in this family property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters) sought to prevent the defendant (respondent) from disposing of disputed ancestral agricultural land. The court granted the relief, finding that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case regarding inheritance rights to the property and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the asset pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary R.C.S. No. 19/2024 - Regular Civil Suit The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim relief in this family property dispute. The plaintiffs (daughters) sought to prevent the defendant (respondent) from disposing of disputed ancestral agricultural land. The court granted the relief, finding that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case regarding inheritance rights to the property and that the balance of convenience favors protecting the asset pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts