Government of Gujarat vs Chandrabhan Kishorbhai Goraviyala Advocate - V V RANVA — 606/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 221,296(B),351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN110007702024

Filing Number

606/2024

Filing Date

19-Nov-2024

Registration No

606/2024

Registration Date

19-Nov-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203007240298

Police Station

BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 221,296(B),351(2),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrabhan Kishorbhai Goraviyala Advocate - V V RANVA

  2. 2.Manglubhai Bhikhubhai Patagir

    Adv. V V RANVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The Mehsana Magistrate Court acquitted two accused of charges under IPC Sections 221, 296(b), 351(2), and 54 related to obstructing a public servant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence lacked credibility and the testimony of examined witnesses did not sufficiently corroborate the charges against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 30-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 07-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 23-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 19-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 606/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Magistrate Court acquitted two accused of charges under IPC Sections 221, 296(b), 351(2), and 54 related to obstructing a public servant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence lacked credibility and the testimony of examined witnesses did not sufficiently corroborate the charges against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case