KAMALIYA RAJABHAI RAMBHAI vs NATHUBHAI KALABHAI KAMALIYA Advocate - R V BHALGARIYA — 36/2019

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 37,38. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Defendant Evidence Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN060003642019

Filing Number

36/2019

Filing Date

01-Apr-2019

Registration No

36/2019

Registration Date

01-Apr-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, MALIA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 37,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMALIYA RAJABHAI RAMBHAI

    Adv. D D DEVANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATHUBHAI KALABHAI KAMALIYA Advocate - R V BHALGARIYA

  2. 2.HAMIRBHAI NATHUBHAI KAMALIYA

    Adv. R V BHALGARIYA

  3. 3.KARANSINH NATHUBHA KAMALIYA

    Adv. R V BHALGARIYA

  4. 4.DILIPBHAI NATHUBHAI KAMALIYA

    Adv. R V BHALGARIYA

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 29-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 22-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 16-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 13-Jun-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 02-May-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 21-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-Feb-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 27-Dec-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 25-Oct-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 16-Aug-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 28-Jun-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 10-May-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 26-Apr-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 23-Feb-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 29-Dec-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 10-Nov-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 29-Sep-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 04-Aug-2023

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Jun-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 09-Jun-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 21-Apr-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 10-Mar-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 03-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 23-Dec-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 11-Nov-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 30-Sep-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 26-Aug-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 15-Jul-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 08-Jul-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 13-May-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 08-Apr-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 04-Mar-2022

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 19-Feb-2022

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary This is a civil case (RCS No.36/2019) from the Principal Civil Court, Maliya Hatina, decided on 18 February 2022. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for declaration of land ownership rights and directed the plaintiff to bear the court costs. The judgment finds that the defendant's ownership claims to the disputed land parcels are valid based on registered documents and survey records, while the plaintiff failed to establish superior title or ownership, and the first decree suit was barred by law. The court also rejected the plaintiff's objections and pleas of estoppel against the defendant's possession and ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  40. 19-Feb-2022

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 04-Feb-2022

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 07-Jan-2022

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 17-Dec-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 12-Nov-2021

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 08-Oct-2021

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 03-Sep-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 06-Aug-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 25-Jun-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 23-Apr-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 19-Mar-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 19-Feb-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 22-Jan-2021

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 04-Dec-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 09-Oct-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 28-Aug-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 24-Jul-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 03-Jul-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 19-Jun-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 29-May-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 08-May-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 17-Apr-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 20-Mar-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 06-Mar-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 31-Jan-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 17-Jan-2020

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 20-Dec-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 06-Dec-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 11-Nov-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 19-Oct-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 20-Sep-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 09-Aug-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 12-Jul-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  73. 14-Jun-2019

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  74. 19-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  75. 01-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil case (RCS No.36/2019) from the Principal Civil Court, Maliya Hatina, decided on 18 February 2022. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for declaration of land ownership rights and directed the plaintiff to bear the court costs. The judgment finds that the defendant's ownership claims to the disputed land parcels are valid based on registered documents and survey records, while the plaintiff failed to establish superior title or ownership, and the first decree suit was barred by law. The court also rejected the plaintiff's objections and pleas of estoppel against the defendant's possession and ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case