STATE OF GUJARAT vs VINAYBHAI DAYABHAI KALARIYA Advocate - J P JOSHI — 318/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN030004372024

Filing Number

318/2024

Filing Date

09-Jul-2024

Registration No

318/2024

Registration Date

09-Jul-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203039240146

Police Station

MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINAYBHAI DAYABHAI KALARIYA Advocate - J P JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 318/2024 State of Gujarat v. Vinaybhai Dayabhai Kalariya The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing injury/death) after finding insufficient evidence of identity and driving conduct. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused was driving the vehicle during the incident or that his driving was rash/negligent, as witness identification lacked corroboration and the vehicle's actual driver remained unidentified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 06-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 02-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 19-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 09-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 17-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 13-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 09-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 09-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 318/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 318/2024 State of Gujarat v. Vinaybhai Dayabhai Kalariya The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing injury/death) after finding insufficient evidence of identity and driving conduct. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused was driving the vehicle during the incident or that his driving was rash/negligent, as witness identification lacked corroboration and the vehicle's actual driver remained unidentified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case