STATE OF GUJARAT vs VINAYBHAI DAYABHAI KALARIYA Advocate - J P JOSHI — 318/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 14th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030004372024
Filing Number
318/2024
Filing Date
09-07-2024
Registration No
318/2024
Registration Date
09-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203039240146
Police Station
MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VINAYBHAI DAYABHAI KALARIYA Advocate - J P JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 01-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 10-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 318/2024 State of Gujarat v. Vinaybhai Dayabhai Kalariya The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing injury/death) after finding insufficient evidence of identity and driving conduct. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused was driving the vehicle during the incident or that his driving was rash/negligent, as witness identification lacked corroboration and the vehicle's actual driver remained unidentified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 318/2024 State of Gujarat v. Vinaybhai Dayabhai Kalariya The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing injury/death) after finding insufficient evidence of identity and driving conduct. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused was driving the vehicle during the incident or that his driving was rash/negligent, as witness identification lacked corroboration and the vehicle's actual driver remained unidentified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts