ANIL S/O ALKHA RAUT vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 198/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005452026
Filing Number
198/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
198/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203024250572
Police Station
JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANIL S/O ALKHA RAUT
Adv. N J DHAMANI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 198/2026 The court rejected the bail plea of accused Anil S/O Alkha Raut in a case involving fraud with SIM cards and illegal financial gain. The court found that the accused and co-conspirators defrauded customers by registering SIM cards in their names without consent, then selling these cards for profit—constituting serious offences under IPC sections 419, 420, and related laws. Considering the gravity of the offence, the organized nature of the fraud, risk of witness tampering, and potential for further crimes, the court denied bail and upheld the accused's custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 198/2026 The court rejected the bail plea of accused Anil S/O Alkha Raut in a case involving fraud with SIM cards and illegal financial gain. The court found that the accused and co-conspirators defrauded customers by registering SIM cards in their names without consent, then selling these cards for profit—constituting serious offences under IPC sections 419, 420, and related laws. Considering the gravity of the offence, the organized nature of the fraud, risk of witness tampering, and potential for further crimes, the court denied bail and upheld the accused's custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts