SOYEBBHAI HASAMBHAI JAGA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V G DONGA — 43/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 11th May 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJJN010005292026
Filing Number
43/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SOYEBBHAI HASAMBHAI JAGA
Adv. A M MAKRANI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - V G DONGA
SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD.
Adv. P M BABARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The trial court convicted the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque, sentencing him to one year simple imprisonment and ordering him to pay compensation equal to the cheque amount (₹3,42,624). The appellate court upheld the conviction and sentence, finding that the complainant finance company had established a legally enforceable debt through a valid loan agreement and that the cheque was issued for discharging this debt, meeting all statutory requirements under Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The trial court convicted the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for dishonoring a cheque, sentencing him to one year simple imprisonment and ordering him to pay compensation equal to the cheque amount (₹3,42,624). The appellate court upheld the conviction and sentence, finding that the complainant finance company had established a legally enforceable debt through a valid loan agreement and that the cheque was issued for discharging this debt, meeting all statutory requirements under Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts