Dinesh Kalabhai Rabdiya vs Karya Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate - A G P — 77/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJM130004302024

Filing Number

77/2024

Filing Date

02-Dec-2024

Registration No

77/2024

Registration Date

02-Dec-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh Kalabhai Rabdiya

    Adv. P R JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karya Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate - A G P

  2. 2.Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Dharol

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Reference (T) No. 77/2024 Court Decision: The Labor Court dismissed Dinesh Kalabhai Rabdiya's industrial dispute reference against the irrigation department officials. Key Facts: Rabdiya, a daily-wage laborer, worked continuously from 2000 to May 1, 2013, for the irrigation department but was terminated verbally without notice, severance pay, or gratuity. He filed for illegal termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, claiming continuous employment status and seeking reinstatement with back wages. Reasoning: The court found Rabdiya failed to prove continuous employment for 240+ days as required under Section 25(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, despite circumstantial evidence. The employer's witness testimony contradicted key details about employment records. The reference was filed 11 years after termination without adequate justification for the delay, making it procedurally defective under amended provisions requiring disputes be filed within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 10-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 08-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 24-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 10-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 20-Aug-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 16-Jul-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 18-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 21-May-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 09-Apr-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 26-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 12-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 05-Mar-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 19-Feb-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 22-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 08-Jan-2025

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 18-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 02-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Reference (T) No. 77/2024 Court Decision: The Labor Court dismissed Dinesh Kalabhai Rabdiya's industrial dispute reference against the irrigation department officials. Key Facts: Rabdiya, a daily-wage laborer, worked continuously from 2000 to May 1, 2013, for the irrigation department but was terminated verbally without notice, severance pay, or gratuity. He filed for illegal termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, claiming continuous employment status and seeking reinstatement with back wages. Reasoning: The court found Rabdiya failed to prove continuous employment for 240+ days as required under Section 25(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, despite circumstantial evidence. The employer's witness testimony contradicted key details about employment records. The reference was filed 11 years after termination without adequate justification for the delay, making it procedurally defective under amended provisions requiring disputes be filed within one year. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case