Mukeshbhai Nathabhai Mendpara vs Kary Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate - A G P — 76/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130004292024
Filing Number
76/2024
Filing Date
02-Dec-2024
Registration No
76/2024
Registration Date
02-Dec-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mukeshbhai Nathabhai Mendpara
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kary Palak Ijnershri Rajkot Advocate - A G P
-
2.Nayab Kary Palak Ijnershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Reference (T) No. 76/2024 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the reference filed by Mukeshbhai Nathabhai Mendpara against the irrigation department respondents, finding that the petitioner was wrongfully terminated from his position as a daily-wage laborer without following legal procedures under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court ordered the respondent to reinstate the petitioner to his original position with continuity of service and full back wages, as the termination violated Section 25(F) of the ID Act and applicable labour laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 76/2024
Case Summary: Reference (T) No. 76/2024 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the reference filed by Mukeshbhai Nathabhai Mendpara against the irrigation department respondents, finding that the petitioner was wrongfully terminated from his position as a daily-wage laborer without following legal procedures under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court ordered the respondent to reinstate the petitioner to his original position with continuity of service and full back wages, as the termination violated Section 25(F) of the ID Act and applicable labour laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts