Parvinbhai Gandubhai Malani vs Kary Palak Injnershri Advocate - A G P — 51/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130003372024
Filing Number
51/2024
Filing Date
10-Sep-2024
Registration No
51/2024
Registration Date
10-Sep-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Parvinbhai Gandubhai Malani
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kary Palak Injnershri Advocate - A G P
-
2.Nayab Kary Ijnershri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary: Case 51/2024 Court Decision: The Labour Court dismissed the respondent authority's reference and held that the petitioner (Parvinbhai Gandubhai Malani), a daily-wage worker employed since 1998, was illegally terminated from service without due process under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and full back wages from the date of termination (01/03/2010). Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner had worked 240+ continuous days annually before termination and was entitled to statutory protections. The employer failed to provide written notice, notice period, severance pay, or proper termination procedure as mandated by law, rendering the dismissal unlawful and arbitrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Dec-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Dec-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Nov-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2024
Summary: Case 51/2024 Court Decision: The Labour Court dismissed the respondent authority's reference and held that the petitioner (Parvinbhai Gandubhai Malani), a daily-wage worker employed since 1998, was illegally terminated from service without due process under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court ordered reinstatement with continuity of service and full back wages from the date of termination (01/03/2010). Key Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner had worked 240+ continuous days annually before termination and was entitled to statutory protections. The employer failed to provide written notice, notice period, severance pay, or proper termination procedure as mandated by law, rendering the dismissal unlawful and arbitrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts