Kishorbhai Nagajibhai Chabhadiya vs Karay PalakIjnershri Rajkot — 46/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130001732025
Filing Number
46/2025
Filing Date
22-Apr-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
22-Apr-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kishorbhai Nagajibhai Chabhadiya
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karay PalakIjnershri Rajkot
-
2.Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 46/2025 The court rejected the petitioner's industrial dispute reference. Kishorbhai Nagajibhai Chabhadiya, a daily wage laborer employed by the Irrigation Department (Respondents) since 2001, was terminated on 01/01/2012 without notice, termination letter, or severance pay. The petitioner claimed illegal termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, asserting continuous service with 240+ working days annually and demanding reinstatement with back wages. The court found the petitioner failed to substantiate continuous employment through credible documentary evidence, holding that mere affidavits without supporting records (muster rolls, appointment letters, wage registers) are insufficient under settled legal principles. The reference was dismissed for lack of proof meeting statutory requirements for continuous service status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2025
Summary of Case 46/2025 The court rejected the petitioner's industrial dispute reference. Kishorbhai Nagajibhai Chabhadiya, a daily wage laborer employed by the Irrigation Department (Respondents) since 2001, was terminated on 01/01/2012 without notice, termination letter, or severance pay. The petitioner claimed illegal termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, asserting continuous service with 240+ working days annually and demanding reinstatement with back wages. The court found the petitioner failed to substantiate continuous employment through credible documentary evidence, holding that mere affidavits without supporting records (muster rolls, appointment letters, wage registers) are insufficient under settled legal principles. The reference was dismissed for lack of proof meeting statutory requirements for continuous service status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts