Vasantbhai Devrajbhai Tarpada vs Karay Palak Ijnershri Rajkot — 45/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130001722025
Filing Number
45/2025
Filing Date
22-Apr-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
22-Apr-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vasantbhai Devrajbhai Tarpada
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karay Palak Ijnershri Rajkot
-
2.Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 45/2025 Court Decision: The court dismissed the reference application filed by the respondents (Karay Palak Ijnershri Rajkot and Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol) against petitioner Vasantbhai Devrajbhai Tarpada's claim for reinstatement. Key Reasoning: The court found that Vasantbhai worked continuously as a daily-wage laborer from 1998 to July 1, 2009, performing regular irrigation work. Despite working over 240 days annually, the employer terminated him without proper notice, severance pay, or following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The employer failed to produce employment records or justify the termination. The court held the dismissal illegal and directed reinstatement with back wages and continuity of service, applying established legal precedents requiring employers to prove proper termination procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2025
Case Summary: 45/2025 Court Decision: The court dismissed the reference application filed by the respondents (Karay Palak Ijnershri Rajkot and Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol) against petitioner Vasantbhai Devrajbhai Tarpada's claim for reinstatement. Key Reasoning: The court found that Vasantbhai worked continuously as a daily-wage laborer from 1998 to July 1, 2009, performing regular irrigation work. Despite working over 240 days annually, the employer terminated him without proper notice, severance pay, or following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The employer failed to produce employment records or justify the termination. The court held the dismissal illegal and directed reinstatement with back wages and continuity of service, applying established legal precedents requiring employers to prove proper termination procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts