Ketanbhai Lalagibhai Tarpada vs Karay Palak Ijnershri Rakot — 43/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 24th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJM130001702025
Filing Number
43/2025
Filing Date
22-Apr-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
22-Apr-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JAMNAGAR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ketanbhai Lalagibhai Tarpada
Adv. P R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karay Palak Ijnershri Rakot
-
2.Nayab Karay Palak Ijnershri Dharol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 43/2025 Petitioner: Ketanbhai Lalagibhai Tarpada Respondents: Executive Engineer, Rajkot Irrigation Department and Nayab (Assistant) Executive Engineer, Irrigation Sub-Division 6/4, Dhrol Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's reference filed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 10(1). Key Reasoning: The petitioner claimed he was illegally terminated from his position as a daily-wage laborer after working continuously since 2005. However, the court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims with sufficient evidence—particularly the required 240 continuous working days needed for protection under labor law. The employer (respondent) successfully raised the defense that termination procedures were properly followed and that the worker did not meet the statutory requirements for permanent employment status. The court upheld this finding, noting the petitioner's long delay in filing the case and lack of documentary proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2026
For Order
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Dec-2025
For Arguement of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Jul-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2025
Case Summary: 43/2025 Petitioner: Ketanbhai Lalagibhai Tarpada Respondents: Executive Engineer, Rajkot Irrigation Department and Nayab (Assistant) Executive Engineer, Irrigation Sub-Division 6/4, Dhrol Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's reference filed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 10(1). Key Reasoning: The petitioner claimed he was illegally terminated from his position as a daily-wage laborer after working continuously since 2005. However, the court found that the petitioner failed to substantiate his claims with sufficient evidence—particularly the required 240 continuous working days needed for protection under labor law. The employer (respondent) successfully raised the defense that termination procedures were properly followed and that the worker did not meet the statutory requirements for permanent employment status. The court upheld this finding, noting the petitioner's long delay in filing the case and lack of documentary proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts