THE STATE vs JAKIRBHAI AMADBHAI DAL Advocate - M D JADEJA — 492/2016
Case under Arms Act Section 025,029. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM110006402016
Filing Number
492/2016
Filing Date
17-Jun-2016
Registration No
492/2016
Registration Date
17-Jun-2016
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALAVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
116
Police Station
KALAVAD RURAL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAKIRBHAI AMADBHAI DAL Advocate - M D JADEJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Jakirbhai Amadbhai Dal (492/2016) The court acquitted the accused of illegal weapons possession charges under the Arms Act, 1959. The State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully possessed a pistol and cartridge. Key evidentiary gaps included: lack of independent witness testimony corroborating the weapon's recovery, absence of proper authorization documentation, and police witnesses providing the sole testimony without substantiation by neutral panch members or investigation officials. The court found the prosecution's case insufficiently grounded in credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2025
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Nov-2023
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Sep-2023
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jun-2023
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jun-2023
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2023
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Dec-2022
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2022
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jul-2022
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2022
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2022
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2021
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Aug-2021
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-May-2021
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Mar-2021
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Dec-2020
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Sep-2020
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jun-2020
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-May-2020
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2020
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Dec-2019
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2019
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jun-2019
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Mar-2019
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2018
Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Nov-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Oct-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Sep-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jul-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jun-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-May-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2018
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Dec-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Aug-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-May-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2017
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2016
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2016
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2016
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Aug-2016
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 492/2016
Case Summary: State v. Jakirbhai Amadbhai Dal (492/2016) The court acquitted the accused of illegal weapons possession charges under the Arms Act, 1959. The State failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully possessed a pistol and cartridge. Key evidentiary gaps included: lack of independent witness testimony corroborating the weapon's recovery, absence of proper authorization documentation, and police witnesses providing the sole testimony without substantiation by neutral panch members or investigation officials. The court found the prosecution's case insufficiently grounded in credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts