Government of Gujarat vs RAJUBHAI DAYABHAI RATHOD Advocate - N H LALANI — 879/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJM040011152025
Filing Number
879/2025
Filing Date
08-07-2025
Registration No
879/2025
Registration Date
08-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11202013250105
Police Station
JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJUBHAI DAYABHAI RATHOD Advocate - N H LALANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 05-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 879/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rajubhai Dayabhai Rathod, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, despite police evidence of alleged illicit liquor recovery from the accused's residence on 03-04-2025. Key Reasoning: The court critically evaluated witness testimony, particularly from the panchas (independent witnesses) present during the recovery operation. The court noted that the panchas failed to substantiate the prosecution's narrative—they merely acknowledged signing documents without confirming the actual recovery facts. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to verify the seized material, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the police account, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 879/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rajubhai Dayabhai Rathod, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, despite police evidence of alleged illicit liquor recovery from the accused's residence on 03-04-2025. Key Reasoning: The court critically evaluated witness testimony, particularly from the panchas (independent witnesses) present during the recovery operation. The court noted that the panchas failed to substantiate the prosecution's narrative—they merely acknowledged signing documents without confirming the actual recovery facts. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to verify the seized material, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the police account, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts