Government of Gujarat vs RAJUBHAI DAYABHAI RATHOD Advocate - N H LALANI — 879/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM040011152025

Case disposed

Filing Number

879/2025

Filing Date

08-07-2025

Registration No

879/2025

Registration Date

08-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202013250105

Police Station

JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65F

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJUBHAI DAYABHAI RATHOD Advocate - N H LALANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

01-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

05-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 879/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rajubhai Dayabhai Rathod, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, despite police evidence of alleged illicit liquor recovery from the accused's residence on 03-04-2025. Key Reasoning: The court critically evaluated witness testimony, particularly from the panchas (independent witnesses) present during the recovery operation. The court noted that the panchas failed to substantiate the prosecution's narrative—they merely acknowledged signing documents without confirming the actual recovery facts. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to verify the seized material, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the police account, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 879/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rajubhai Dayabhai Rathod, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, despite police evidence of alleged illicit liquor recovery from the accused's residence on 03-04-2025. Key Reasoning: The court critically evaluated witness testimony, particularly from the panchas (independent witnesses) present during the recovery operation. The court noted that the panchas failed to substantiate the prosecution's narrative—they merely acknowledged signing documents without confirming the actual recovery facts. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to verify the seized material, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the police account, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case