Government of Gujarat vs RAJUBHAI DAYABHAI RATHOD Advocate - N H LALANI — 879/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJM040011152025

Filing Number

879/2025

Filing Date

08-Jul-2025

Registration No

879/2025

Registration Date

08-Jul-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMJODHPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11202013250105

Police Station

JAMJODHPUR POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHAI DAYABHAI RATHOD Advocate - N H LALANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 879/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rajubhai Dayabhai Rathod, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, despite police evidence of alleged illicit liquor recovery from the accused's residence on 03-04-2025. Key Reasoning: The court critically evaluated witness testimony, particularly from the panchas (independent witnesses) present during the recovery operation. The court noted that the panchas failed to substantiate the prosecution's narrative—they merely acknowledged signing documents without confirming the actual recovery facts. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to verify the seized material, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the police account, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 08-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 879/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 879/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Rajubhai Dayabhai Rathod, was acquitted of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 65(F). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, despite police evidence of alleged illicit liquor recovery from the accused's residence on 03-04-2025. Key Reasoning: The court critically evaluated witness testimony, particularly from the panchas (independent witnesses) present during the recovery operation. The court noted that the panchas failed to substantiate the prosecution's narrative—they merely acknowledged signing documents without confirming the actual recovery facts. Additionally, no FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report was submitted to verify the seized material, and no independent corroborating evidence supported the police account, creating reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case