Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. vs MAHENDRASINH HEMNATSANG CHUDASMA Advocate - V R RUPAPARA — 201/2023
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd May 2026.
ELEC - SPECIAL CASE - ELECTRICITY
CNR: GJJM010027612023
Filing Number
201/2023
Filing Date
17-Aug-2023
Registration No
201/2023
Registration Date
17-Aug-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JANMAGAR
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
867
Police Station
GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd.
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHENDRASINH HEMNATSANG CHUDASMA Advocate - V R RUPAPARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Special (Ele.) Case No. 201/2023 Court Decision: The Special Electricity Court, Jamnagar acquitted the accused Mahendrasinh Hemnatsang Chudasma of charges under Section 137 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence presented by the complainant (Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.) was insufficient and lacked credible corroboration regarding the accused's involvement in the alleged theft of electricity worth Rs. 26,318-50. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
01-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
15-Jan-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Dec-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-May-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
27-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 201/2023
Case Summary: Special (Ele.) Case No. 201/2023 Court Decision: The Special Electricity Court, Jamnagar acquitted the accused Mahendrasinh Hemnatsang Chudasma of charges under Section 137 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 for alleged electricity theft. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence presented by the complainant (Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.) was insufficient and lacked credible corroboration regarding the accused's involvement in the alleged theft of electricity worth Rs. 26,318-50. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts