AJAYKUMAR BABUBHAI PARMAR vs NIMUBEN URFE NAYNABEN D/O BHAGVANBHAI DUDABHAI SOSA W/O RAJKUMAR URFE HARESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI VADHER — 11/2025

Case Summary: RCA No-11/2025 Court Decision: The appellate court allowed the appeals (RCA No-06/2024, RCA No-03/2025, and RCA No-11/2025) filed by Ajaykumar Babubhai Parmar and Sanjaykumar Babubhai Parmar. The court set aside the trial court's judgment and decree dated May 8, 2026, finding that the original plaintiff's (Nimuben/Naynaben's) suit was barred by the law of limitation and that the defendants (appellants) were bona fide purchasers for value without notice of the disputed agricultural properties. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the plaintiff's claim to ancestral property rights had expired under the Limitation Act, as she failed to initiate proceedings within the prescribed time period after attaining majority. Additionally, the defendants had purchased the land through registered sale deeds in 2006 and 2010 based on valid revenue records showing clear title, thereby acquiring protected ownership rights that could not be disturbed after such substantial passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.