PGVCL SUBDIVISION TALALA vs NATHABHAI PARBATBHAI VADHER — 30/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: SUMMONS - NOTICE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGS070009972024

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

30/2024

Filing Date

24-06-2024

Registration No

30/2024

Registration Date

24-06-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, TALALA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL SUBDIVISION TALALA

Adv. M R MEHTA

Respondent(s)

NATHABHAI PARBATBHAI VADHER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

29-04-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

13-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

11-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

05-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

19-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Interim Orders

01-04-2025
ORDER

Case Summary: 30/2024 - PGVCL Subdivision Talala vs. Nathabhai Parbatbhai Vadher Outcome: Plaint rejected and cases dismissed. The court rejected electricity theft cases filed by PGVCL against non-paying consumers under the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found the cases lack legal basis under Section 135 and 154(5) of the Act, as civil liability for electricity theft must first be determined by a Special Court in criminal proceedings—it cannot be recovered through civil suits. Since no prior criminal conviction existed, the civil recovery claims were dismissed as premature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 30/2024 - PGVCL Subdivision Talala vs. Nathabhai Parbatbhai Vadher Outcome: Plaint rejected and cases dismissed. The court rejected electricity theft cases filed by PGVCL against non-paying consumers under the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found the cases lack legal basis under Section 135 and 154(5) of the Act, as civil liability for electricity theft must first be determined by a Special Court in criminal proceedings—it cannot be recovered through civil suits. Since no prior criminal conviction existed, the civil recovery claims were dismissed as premature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, TALALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case