PGVCL SUBDIVISION TALALA vs NATHABHAI PARBATBHAI VADHER — 30/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: SUMMONS - NOTICE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGS070009972024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
30/2024
Filing Date
24-06-2024
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
24-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL SUBDIVISION TALALA
Adv. M R MEHTA
Respondent(s)
NATHABHAI PARBATBHAI VADHER
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 11-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 05-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 19-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 30/2024 - PGVCL Subdivision Talala vs. Nathabhai Parbatbhai Vadher Outcome: Plaint rejected and cases dismissed. The court rejected electricity theft cases filed by PGVCL against non-paying consumers under the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found the cases lack legal basis under Section 135 and 154(5) of the Act, as civil liability for electricity theft must first be determined by a Special Court in criminal proceedings—it cannot be recovered through civil suits. Since no prior criminal conviction existed, the civil recovery claims were dismissed as premature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 30/2024 - PGVCL Subdivision Talala vs. Nathabhai Parbatbhai Vadher Outcome: Plaint rejected and cases dismissed. The court rejected electricity theft cases filed by PGVCL against non-paying consumers under the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found the cases lack legal basis under Section 135 and 154(5) of the Act, as civil liability for electricity theft must first be determined by a Special Court in criminal proceedings—it cannot be recovered through civil suits. Since no prior criminal conviction existed, the civil recovery claims were dismissed as premature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts