ARJANBHAI RANABHAI VALA vs BHIMASIBHAI PUNJABHAI NANDANIYA Advocate - R.S.APARNATHI — 427/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS070006422018
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
427/2018
Filing Date
07-12-2018
Registration No
427/2018
Registration Date
07-12-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARJANBHAI RANABHAI VALA
Adv. D.B.VADHAVANA
Respondent(s)
BHIMASIBHAI PUNJABHAI NANDANIYA Advocate - R.S.APARNATHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Bhimshbhai Punjabhbhai Nandaniya in this Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138/142 case. The complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt beyond reasonable doubt, despite the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act. The accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption by establishing that the cheque was issued as security for conditional property transactions, not for debt discharge, meeting the preponderance of probabilities standard required under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Bhimshbhai Punjabhbhai Nandaniya in this Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138/142 case. The complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt beyond reasonable doubt, despite the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act. The accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumption by establishing that the cheque was issued as security for conditional property transactions, not for debt discharge, meeting the preponderance of probabilities standard required under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts