Prafulbhai Gordhanbhai(Absconding) vs Dinesh Shambhubhai(Absconding) Advocate - D A KAYASTHA — 469/2010
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,454. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGS070003722010
Filing Number
469/2010
Filing Date
20-11-2010
Registration No
469/2010
Registration Date
20-11-2010
Court
TALUKA COURT, TALALA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
I 56
Police Station
TALALA POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prafulbhai Gordhanbhai(Absconding)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dinesh Shambhubhai(Absconding) Advocate - D A KAYASTHA
Savitaben Dineshbhai
Adv. D A KAYASTHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: 469/2010 Court Decision: Both accused persons acquitted (not guilty). Accused #1 (Dinesh Shambhubhai, absconding) acquitted under IPC Sections 380, 454. Accused #2 (Savitaben) acquitted on abetment charges and case against her abated due to death during trial. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant establishing that jewelry worth ₹1,67,000 and ₹47,000 cash were stolen from his home, the court found prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the theft. Witness testimony supported the burglary occurred, but no direct evidence linked the accused to the crime, and circumstantial evidence was insufficient under established legal precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 469/2010 Court Decision: Both accused persons acquitted (not guilty). Accused #1 (Dinesh Shambhubhai, absconding) acquitted under IPC Sections 380, 454. Accused #2 (Savitaben) acquitted on abetment charges and case against her abated due to death during trial. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant establishing that jewelry worth ₹1,67,000 and ₹47,000 cash were stolen from his home, the court found prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the theft. Witness testimony supported the burglary occurred, but no direct evidence linked the accused to the crime, and circumstantial evidence was insufficient under established legal precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts