RAMABHAI PUNABHAI CHUDASAMA vs VARJANGBHAI PUNABHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - D H PAMPANIYA — 20/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 6,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGS050001662024
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20/2024
Filing Date
05-02-2024
Registration No
20/2024
Registration Date
05-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUTRAPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMABHAI PUNABHAI CHUDASAMA
Adv. H J VAZA
Respondent(s)
VARJANGBHAI PUNABHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - D H PAMPANIYA
BHOJABHAI PUNABHAI CHUDASAMA
Adv. D H PAMPANIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 11-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (Ankik-5) seeking relief regarding agricultural land ownership. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three essential requirements for granting temporary injunctions. Consequently, the court ruled that the application lacked legal merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction (Ankik-5) seeking relief regarding agricultural land ownership. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three essential requirements for granting temporary injunctions. Consequently, the court ruled that the application lacked legal merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts