TARABEN D O NANJIBHAI DEDANIYA W O BHAVESHBHAI GODHASARA vs NANJIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI DEDANIYA — 31/2021
Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6A. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGS020031102021
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
31/2021
Filing Date
26-10-2021
Registration No
31/2021
Registration Date
26-10-2021
Court
Civil Court, Veraval
Judge
14-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TARABEN D O NANJIBHAI DEDANIYA W O BHAVESHBHAI GODHASARA
Adv. R A SIRAJI
DIVYABEN D O NANJIBHAI DEDANIYA W O KIRITBHAI KAMANI
Adv. R.A.SIRAJI
Respondent(s)
NANJIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI DEDANIYA
LAKHMANBHAI JAGMALBHAI CHANDERA
Adv. V.C.MAVADHIYA
HITESHBHAI NANJIBHAI DEDANIYA
Adv. R P PANDYA
PRIYA HITESHBHAI DEDANIYA
Adv. R P PANDYA
RUCHIT HITESHBHAI DEDANIYA
Adv. R P PANDYA
TURAK ALI RAHEMANBHAI
Adv. A.I.SUMARA
TURAK YUSUF GULAMHUSEN(Legal Heir)
TURAK HANIF GULAMHUSEN
Adv. A.I.SUMARA
TURAK SALIM GULAMHUSEN
Adv. A.I.SUMARA
TURAK HAMIDA GULAMHUSEN W O KARIMBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. A.I.SUMARA
Hearing History
Judge: 14-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
ISSUES
ISSUES
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | ISSUES |
| 03-04-2026 | ISSUES |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
| 12-02-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
| 22-01-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 31/2021 Outcome: The petitioners' applications for temporary and permanent injunctions were DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' claims seeking to void three registered sale deeds and obtain partition of ancestral agricultural land. The judge found that after ancestral property is partitioned among family members, each recipient's share becomes their self-acquired property, which they may freely sell without requiring consent from other family members. Since the property had been lawfully partitioned and subsequently sold by the father (Respondent 1) to innocent purchasers, and as the petitioners had no registered claim in the revenue records, the court determined they had no prima facie case for the injunctions sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 31/2021 Outcome: The petitioners' applications for temporary and permanent injunctions were DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioners' claims seeking to void three registered sale deeds and obtain partition of ancestral agricultural land. The judge found that after ancestral property is partitioned among family members, each recipient's share becomes their self-acquired property, which they may freely sell without requiring consent from other family members. Since the property had been lawfully partitioned and subsequently sold by the father (Respondent 1) to innocent purchasers, and as the petitioners had no registered claim in the revenue records, the court determined they had no prima facie case for the injunctions sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts