The State of Gujarat vs PRAVINBHAI JESINGBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B THANKI — 20/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(N),506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 29th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJGS010008052022
Filing Number
20/2022
Filing Date
29-Apr-2022
Registration No
20/2022
Registration Date
29-Apr-2022
Court
District Court, Veraval
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11186004220080
Police Station
PRABHAS PATAN POLICE STATION - GIR SOMNATH DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Gujarat
Adv. K D VALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAVINBHAI JESINGBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A B THANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
CASE SUMMARY In Sessions Case No. 20/2022, the State of Gujarat prosecuted PRAVINBHAI JESINGBHAI PARMAR, a teacher, on charges under IPC sections 376(2)(N) and 506(2) for allegedly seducing and sexually assaulting a young woman under promise of marriage. The court partially convicted the accused of rape under section 376(2)(N), sentencing him to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹5,000, while acquitting him under section 506(2) regarding death threats. The judgment emphasized that consent given under false promise of marriage and misconception of fact is not valid consent under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Judgement
Addl. District Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Addl. District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Further Statement
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. District Judge
-
08-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
12-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
14-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-Apr-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-Jan-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Jan-2023
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
17-Nov-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Nov-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Sep-2022
Framing Of Charge/Plea
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Aug-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
02-Jul-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
06-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
23-May-2022
Process To Accused
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-May-2022
Process To Accused
3rd Addl District Judge
-
29-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2022
CASE SUMMARY In Sessions Case No. 20/2022, the State of Gujarat prosecuted PRAVINBHAI JESINGBHAI PARMAR, a teacher, on charges under IPC sections 376(2)(N) and 506(2) for allegedly seducing and sexually assaulting a young woman under promise of marriage. The court partially convicted the accused of rape under section 376(2)(N), sentencing him to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹5,000, while acquitting him under section 506(2) regarding death threats. The judgment emphasized that consent given under false promise of marriage and misconception of fact is not valid consent under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts