SATHVARA JAGDISH MANUBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 36/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060002212024
Next Hearing
03rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATHVARA JAGDISH MANUBHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE LABOUR COURT KALOL
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
For Evidence of Applicant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 09-01-2026 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 20-12-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant | |
| 15-11-2025 | For Evidence of Applicant |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: BIR Interim Application No. 36-2024, Labour Court, Kalol Outcome: The interim application seeking interim relief (maintenance allowance at 75% of wages pending case disposal) was dismissed/rejected. The court held that an employee terminated from service is not entitled to interim maintenance allowance under Section 119(D) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, as such relief is only available to suspended employees, not discharged ones. The court found no prima facie case, irreparable harm, or balance of convenience favoring the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: BIR Interim Application No. 36-2024, Labour Court, Kalol Outcome: The interim application seeking interim relief (maintenance allowance at 75% of wages pending case disposal) was dismissed/rejected. The court held that an employee terminated from service is not entitled to interim maintenance allowance under Section 119(D) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, as such relief is only available to suspended employees, not discharged ones. The court found no prima facie case, irreparable harm, or balance of convenience favoring the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts