SATHVARA JAGDISH MANUBHAI vs THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA — 36/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 79,1. Status: For Evidence of Applicant. Next hearing: 03rd April 2026.
TAPP LC - Application for Termination
CNR: GJGN060002212024
Filing Number
36/2024
Filing Date
03-Jul-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
03-Jul-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, KALOL
Judge
1-Judge Labour Court Kalol
Last updated 21-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATHVARA JAGDISH MANUBHAI
Adv. A N PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ARVIND LTD. Advocate - B K OZA
Case History
-
03-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
06-Feb-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
09-Jan-2026
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
20-Dec-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
15-Nov-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
04-Oct-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
02-Sep-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
07-Aug-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
15-Jul-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
17-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
27-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge Labour Court Kalol
-
29-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
15-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: BIR Interim Application No. 36-2024, Labour Court, Kalol Outcome: The interim application seeking interim relief (maintenance allowance at 75% of wages pending case disposal) was dismissed/rejected. The court held that an employee terminated from service is not entitled to interim maintenance allowance under Section 119(D) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, as such relief is only available to suspended employees, not discharged ones. The court found no prima facie case, irreparable harm, or balance of convenience favoring the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Mar-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
27-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Feb-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
04-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-Dec-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
22-Oct-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Oct-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Sep-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Aug-2024
For Notice Serve to opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2024
Court Order Summary Case: BIR Interim Application No. 36-2024, Labour Court, Kalol Outcome: The interim application seeking interim relief (maintenance allowance at 75% of wages pending case disposal) was dismissed/rejected. The court held that an employee terminated from service is not entitled to interim maintenance allowance under Section 119(D) of the Gujarat Industrial Relations Act, 1946, as such relief is only available to suspended employees, not discharged ones. The court found no prima facie case, irreparable harm, or balance of convenience favoring the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts