MISTRI HARESHKUMAR DAHYABHAI vs PATEL BIPINKUMAR SOMABHAI Advocate - V R THAKOR — 969/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 23rd March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN040017022024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

969/2024

Filing Date

17-12-2024

Registration No

969/2024

Registration Date

17-12-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

MISTRI HARESHKUMAR DAHYABHAI

Adv. M M PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

PATEL BIPINKUMAR SOMABHAI Advocate - V R THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.

23-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS

16-02-2026

FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS

17-01-2026

FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,87,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to repay the amount within 15 days of receiving notice, and provided no credible defense despite the statutory presumption favoring the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,87,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to repay the amount within 15 days of receiving notice, and provided no credible defense despite the statutory presumption favoring the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case