MISTRI HARESHKUMAR DAHYABHAI vs PATEL BIPINKUMAR SOMABHAI Advocate - V R THAKOR — 969/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGN040017022024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
969/2024
Filing Date
17-12-2024
Registration No
969/2024
Registration Date
17-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANSA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MISTRI HARESHKUMAR DAHYABHAI
Adv. M M PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
PATEL BIPINKUMAR SOMABHAI Advocate - V R THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Disposed
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,87,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to repay the amount within 15 days of receiving notice, and provided no credible defense despite the statutory presumption favoring the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,87,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to repay the amount within 15 days of receiving notice, and provided no credible defense despite the statutory presumption favoring the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts