MISTRI HARESHKUMAR DAHYABHAI vs PATEL BIPINKUMAR SOMABHAI Advocate - V R THAKOR — 969/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN040017022024

Filing Number

969/2024

Filing Date

17-Dec-2024

Registration No

969/2024

Registration Date

17-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MISTRI HARESHKUMAR DAHYABHAI

    Adv. M M PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL BIPINKUMAR SOMABHAI Advocate - V R THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,87,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to repay the amount within 15 days of receiving notice, and provided no credible defense despite the statutory presumption favoring the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 01-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 05-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 03-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 29-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 17-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 969/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,87,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to repay the amount within 15 days of receiving notice, and provided no credible defense despite the statutory presumption favoring the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered payment of compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case