CHAUDHARI ASHABEN NARESHKUMAR vs PATEL NIRAVKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - H R BAROT — 755/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJGN040014092024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
755/2024
Filing Date
09-10-2024
Registration No
755/2024
Registration Date
09-10-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANSA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAUDHARI ASHABEN NARESHKUMAR
Adv. A M KURESHI
Respondent(s)
PATEL NIRAVKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - H R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Disposed
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING / ARGUMENTS | |
| 19-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 10-12-2025 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 15,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused's claim that the cheque was returned without proper notice was rejected, as the complainant provided sufficient documentary evidence and legal presumptions favored the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 15,00,000 to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 15,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused's claim that the cheque was returned without proper notice was rejected, as the complainant provided sufficient documentary evidence and legal presumptions favored the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 15,00,000 to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts