CHAUDHARI ASHABEN NARESHKUMAR vs PATEL NIRAVKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - H R BAROT — 755/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJGN040014092024

Filing Number

755/2024

Filing Date

09-Oct-2024

Registration No

755/2024

Registration Date

09-Oct-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANSA

Judge

3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAUDHARI ASHABEN NARESHKUMAR

    Adv. A M KURESHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL NIRAVKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - H R BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 15,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused's claim that the cheque was returned without proper notice was rejected, as the complainant provided sufficient documentary evidence and legal presumptions favored the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 15,00,000 to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing / Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  9. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  11. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  12. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  13. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  14. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  15. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  16. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  17. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  18. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  19. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.

  20. 11-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 09-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 755/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 for issuing a cheque of Rs. 15,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The accused's claim that the cheque was returned without proper notice was rejected, as the complainant provided sufficient documentary evidence and legal presumptions favored the cheque holder. The court sentenced the accused to one year imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 15,00,000 to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case