LAXMANJI JENAJI vs PATEL RACHHODBHAI RAMABHAI Advocate - M G SHAIKH — 85/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030012472023
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
85/2023
Filing Date
05-05-2023
Registration No
85/2023
Registration Date
05-05-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAXMANJI JENAJI
Adv. A N MANSURI
SAVITABEN WD/O RANCHHODBHAI JENAJI
ISHWARBHAI RANCHHODBHAI
BHANUBHAI POPATBHAI
RAKESHBHAI POPATBHAI
KANJIBHAI RANCHHODBHAI POA HOLDER OF 1 TO 5
Respondent(s)
PATEL RACHHODBHAI RAMABHAI Advocate - M G SHAIKH
BHOI CHANDUBHAI KHODIDAS
CHAUHAN BALAJI RAMAJI
Adv. M G SHAIKH
ASHABEN PARBATJI
Adv. M G SHAIKH
SOLANKI ANJANABEN PRATAPSINH
Adv. M G SHAIKH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 16-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 18-07-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 26-06-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking cancellation of a registered agricultural land sale deed dated 02.07.2009. The court held that non-payment of sale consideration alone cannot invalidate a completed registered sale, and the plaintiffs' claim was vexatious and meritless under Order VII Rule 11(a). The plaint was dismissed with the plaintiff's petition being allowed to the extent that the defendant's unlawful deed was declared void, but the registered sale deed itself remains valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking cancellation of a registered agricultural land sale deed dated 02.07.2009. The court held that non-payment of sale consideration alone cannot invalidate a completed registered sale, and the plaintiffs' claim was vexatious and meritless under Order VII Rule 11(a). The plaint was dismissed with the plaintiff's petition being allowed to the extent that the defendant's unlawful deed was declared void, but the registered sale deed itself remains valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts