LAXMANJI JENAJI vs PATEL RACHHODBHAI RAMABHAI Advocate - M G SHAIKH — 85/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 08-May-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJGN030012472023

Filing Number

85/2023

Filing Date

05-May-2023

Registration No

85/2023

Registration Date

05-May-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAXMANJI JENAJI

    Adv. A N MANSURI

  2. 2.SAVITABEN WD/O RANCHHODBHAI JENAJI

  3. 3.ISHWARBHAI RANCHHODBHAI

  4. 4.BHANUBHAI POPATBHAI

  5. 5.RAKESHBHAI POPATBHAI

  6. 6.KANJIBHAI RANCHHODBHAI POA HOLDER OF 1 TO 5

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATEL RACHHODBHAI RAMABHAI Advocate - M G SHAIKH

  2. 2.BHOI CHANDUBHAI KHODIDAS

  3. 3.CHAUHAN BALAJI RAMAJI

    Adv. M G SHAIKH

  4. 4.ASHABEN PARBATJI

    Adv. M G SHAIKH

  5. 5.SOLANKI ANJANABEN PRATAPSINH

    Adv. M G SHAIKH

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 08-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 18-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 27-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 25-Oct-2024

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking cancellation of a registered agricultural land sale deed dated 02.07.2009. The court held that non-payment of sale consideration alone cannot invalidate a completed registered sale, and the plaintiffs' claim was vexatious and meritless under Order VII Rule 11(a). The plaint was dismissed with the plaintiff's petition being allowed to the extent that the defendant's unlawful deed was declared void, but the registered sale deed itself remains valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 25-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 15-Oct-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 05-Oct-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 19-Sep-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 31-Aug-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 09-Aug-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Jul-2024

    For Rejoinder

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 26-Apr-2024

    For Rejoinder

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 29-Mar-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 01-Mar-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 25-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 04-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 23-Nov-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 12-Oct-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 31-Aug-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 28-Jul-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 06-Jul-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 06-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 05-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2023

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking cancellation of a registered agricultural land sale deed dated 02.07.2009. The court held that non-payment of sale consideration alone cannot invalidate a completed registered sale, and the plaintiffs' claim was vexatious and meritless under Order VII Rule 11(a). The plaint was dismissed with the plaintiff's petition being allowed to the extent that the defendant's unlawful deed was declared void, but the registered sale deed itself remains valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case