MAIYAT VAJUBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL VARAS ANILABEN D/O VAJUBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL W/O ASHWINBHAI PATEL vs MANAJI DAHYAJI THAKOR Advocate - G M PATEL — 59/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030005842024
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
59/2024
Filing Date
18-04-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
18-04-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAIYAT VAJUBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL VARAS ANILABEN D/O VAJUBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL W/O ASHWINBHAI PATEL
Adv. D C PATEL
KOKILABEN D/O VAJUBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL W/O BABUBHAI PATEL
JAGRUTIBEN D/O VAJUBHAI BALDEVBHAI PATEL W/O RAJENDRAKUMAR PATEL
BIPINBHAI VAJUBHAI PATEL 1 TO 3 POWER HOLDER
Adv. D C PATEL
Respondent(s)
MANAJI DAHYAJI THAKOR Advocate - G M PATEL
HEMATAJI DAHYAJI THAKOR
Adv. G M PATEL
BALAJI DAHYAJI THAKOR
Adv. G M PATEL
LALIBEN DAHYAJI THAKOR
Adv. G M PATEL
FULAJI DAHYAJI THAKOR
Adv. G M PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 12-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 01-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 29-09-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 11-08-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal regarding ownership and possession of agricultural land. The court set aside the previous orders that had cancelled the sale deeds and directed that the defendants' names be restored as the rightful registered owners and possessors of the disputed property, thereby granting the plaintiffs' relief sought in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal regarding ownership and possession of agricultural land. The court set aside the previous orders that had cancelled the sale deeds and directed that the defendants' names be restored as the rightful registered owners and possessors of the disputed property, thereby granting the plaintiffs' relief sought in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts