JAYSUKH JIVRAJBHAI MULANI vs THAKOR SARDARJI PUNAJAJI — 5/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 35,38,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJGN030000422022
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2022
Filing Date
19-01-2022
Registration No
5/2022
Registration Date
19-01-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEHGAM
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYSUKH JIVRAJBHAI MULANI
Adv. R.B.CHAVDA
Respondent(s)
THAKOR SARDARJI PUNAJAJI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 03-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 10-10-2025 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 29-08-2025 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 04-07-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought regarding disputed land ownership and possession. While the court maintained status quo on the disputed property until final adjudication, it did not grant the injunction requested by the plaintiff, finding insufficient evidence of the plaintiff's legal right to the land in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition was dismissed. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for the relief sought regarding disputed land ownership and possession. While the court maintained status quo on the disputed property until final adjudication, it did not grant the injunction requested by the plaintiff, finding insufficient evidence of the plaintiff's legal right to the land in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts